
Republican · House · FL
Scott Mr Franklin's stock portfolio and returns vs the S&P 500, built from publicly disclosed congressional trades. Simulated using FIFO position matching and time-weighted returns.
Portfolio Value
$2.1M
Unrealized P&L
$327K
+18.9%
Realized P&L
$78K
Open Positions
27
Performance vs S&P 500
1M
-4.9%
SPY +0.6%
α -5.5%
3M
+4.3%
SPY +4.6%
α -0.3%
6M
+10.7%
SPY +21.1%
α -10.4%
1Y
+9.0%
SPY +15.8%
α -6.8%
3Y
+31.7%
SPY +81.0%
α -49.3%
5Y
+31.2%
SPY +81.7%
α -50.5%
All
+31.2%
SPY +81.7%
α -50.5%
Head-to-head with S&P 500
Live Holdings27 positions
| Ticker | Shares | Current | Value | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,762 | $106.33 | $187K | +113.5% | |
| 293 | $524.30 | $154K | +22.4% | |
| 462 | $304.94 | $141K | +69.9% | |
| 258 | $508.30 | $131K | +45.4% | |
| 239 | $499.77 | $120K | +77.2% | |
| 290 | $408.01 | $118K | +29.8% | |
| 342 | $334.92 | $114K | +25.8% | |
| 144 | $770.96 | $111K | +22.0% | |
| 403 | $275.36 | $111K | +21.8% | |
| 316 | $343.76 | $109K | +19.5% | |
| 387 | $249.47 | $97K | +16.4% | |
| 328 | $287.61 | $94K | +3.5% | |
| 322 | $273.68 | $88K | +6.0% | |
| 329 | $264.29 | $87K | -4.4% | |
| 244 | $338.11 | $82K | +140.1% | |
| 2,981 | $22.64 | $67K | -43.4% | |
| 1,407 | $38.23 | $54K | -33.6% | |
| 286 | $184.47 | $53K | -42.1% | |
| 40 | $904.59 | $36K | +57.9% | |
| 95 | $268.61 | $26K | +69.0% | |
| 243 | $103.23 | $25K | -22.8% | |
| 119 | $142.13 | $17K | +111.5% | |
| 93 | $168.90 | $16K | -15.5% | |
| 43 | $148.15 | $6K | +31.7% | |
| 14 | $370.96 | $5K | -34.5% | |
UH UHG | 3,323 | $1.22 | $4K | -87.5% |
| 31 | $129.86 | $4K | -24.4% |
About this simulation
This portfolio is a simulation built from publicly disclosed STOCK Act filings. Since politicians only report trade amounts as ranges (e.g., “$1,001 - $15,000”), we use the midpoint of each range and the closing price on the trade date to estimate share counts. Returns are calculated using Time-Weighted Return (TWR), the industry standard for measuring stock-picking skill independent of cash flow timing. Read the full methodology →