
Republican · House · FL
Scott Mr Franklin's stock portfolio and returns vs the S&P 500, built from publicly disclosed congressional trades. Simulated using FIFO position matching and time-weighted returns.
Portfolio Value
$2.2M
Unrealized P&L
$450K
+26.0%
Realized P&L
$78K
Open Positions
27
Performance vs S&P 500
1M
+7.0%
SPY +3.7%
α +3.3%
3M
+9.8%
SPY +4.6%
α +5.2%
6M
+8.0%
SPY +11.4%
α -3.5%
1Y
+19.1%
SPY +22.3%
α -3.2%
3Y
+34.4%
SPY +73.2%
α -38.8%
5Y
+39.2%
SPY +83.0%
α -43.7%
All
+39.2%
SPY +83.0%
α -43.7%
Head-to-head with S&P 500
Live Holdings27 positions
| Ticker | Shares | Current | Value | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,762 | $120.93 | $213K | +142.8% | |
| 293 | $587.24 | $172K | +37.1% | |
| 462 | $297.13 | $137K | +65.5% | |
| 258 | $520.13 | $134K | +48.8% | |
| 316 | $390.97 | $124K | +35.9% | |
| 239 | $501.42 | $120K | +77.8% | |
| 342 | $350.57 | $120K | +31.7% | |
| 290 | $411.21 | $119K | +30.8% | |
| 403 | $293.83 | $118K | +30.0% | |
| 144 | $776.25 | $112K | +22.8% | |
| 387 | $274.11 | $106K | +27.9% | |
| 328 | $302.69 | $99K | +8.9% | |
| 322 | $295.85 | $95K | +14.6% | |
| 329 | $271.76 | $89K | -1.7% | |
| 244 | $354.73 | $86K | +151.9% | |
| 2,981 | $25.38 | $76K | -36.5% | |
| 1,407 | $47.24 | $66K | -17.9% | |
| 286 | $176.07 | $50K | -44.7% | |
| 40 | $947.51 | $38K | +65.3% | |
| 243 | $104.91 | $26K | -21.5% | |
| 95 | $257.84 | $25K | +62.3% | |
| 93 | $183.30 | $17K | -8.3% | |
| 119 | $141.93 | $17K | +111.2% | |
| 14 | $408.82 | $6K | -27.8% | |
| 43 | $128.59 | $5K | +14.3% | |
| 31 | $139.29 | $4K | -18.9% | |
UH UHG | 3,323 | $1.22 | $4K | -87.5% |
About this simulation
This portfolio is a simulation built from publicly disclosed STOCK Act filings. Since politicians only report trade amounts as ranges (e.g., “$1,001 - $15,000”), we use the midpoint of each range and the closing price on the trade date to estimate share counts. Returns are calculated using Time-Weighted Return (TWR), the industry standard for measuring stock-picking skill independent of cash flow timing. Read the full methodology →