
Republican · House · FL
Scott Mr Franklin's stock portfolio and returns vs the S&P 500, built from publicly disclosed congressional trades. Simulated using FIFO position matching and time-weighted returns.
Portfolio Value
$2.1M
Unrealized P&L
$413K
+23.9%
Realized P&L
$78K
Open Positions
27
Performance vs S&P 500
1M
+3.0%
SPY -5.4%
α +8.4%
3M
-2.8%
SPY -4.9%
α +2.1%
6M
+7.5%
SPY -0.5%
α +8.1%
1Y
+15.8%
SPY +9.7%
α +6.1%
3Y
+32.6%
SPY +69.0%
α -36.4%
5Y
+36.4%
SPY +74.0%
α -37.6%
All
+36.4%
SPY +74.0%
α -37.6%
Head-to-head with S&P 500
Live Holdings27 positions
| Ticker | Shares | Current | Value | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 293 | $567.66 | $166K | +32.5% | |
| 1,762 | $94.30 | $166K | +89.3% | |
| 258 | $572.61 | $148K | +63.8% | |
| 290 | $461.52 | $134K | +46.9% | |
| 239 | $531.70 | $127K | +88.5% | |
| 342 | $366.41 | $125K | +37.6% | |
| 462 | $270.83 | $125K | +50.9% | |
| 403 | $292.17 | $118K | +29.2% | |
| 316 | $355.27 | $112K | +23.5% | |
| 144 | $740.35 | $107K | +17.1% | |
| 387 | $259.91 | $101K | +21.3% | |
| 328 | $305.80 | $100K | +10.1% | |
| 329 | $304.00 | $100K | +9.9% | |
| 322 | $281.89 | $91K | +9.2% | |
| 286 | $260.70 | $74K | -18.1% | |
| 2,981 | $24.57 | $73K | -38.5% | |
| 244 | $285.72 | $70K | +102.9% | |
| 1,407 | $40.23 | $57K | -30.1% | |
| 40 | $1057.22 | $43K | +84.5% | |
| 243 | $117.05 | $28K | -12.4% | |
| 95 | $275.01 | $26K | +73.1% | |
| 93 | $178.85 | $17K | -10.5% | |
| 119 | $129.90 | $15K | +93.3% | |
| 43 | $146.65 | $6K | +30.4% | |
| 14 | $393.58 | $6K | -30.5% | |
| 31 | $141.22 | $4K | -17.8% | |
UH UHG | 3,323 | $1.22 | $4K | -87.5% |
About this simulation
This portfolio is a simulation built from publicly disclosed STOCK Act filings. Since politicians only report trade amounts as ranges (e.g., “$1,001 - $15,000”), we use the midpoint of each range and the closing price on the trade date to estimate share counts. Returns are calculated using Time-Weighted Return (TWR), the industry standard for measuring stock-picking skill independent of cash flow timing. Read the full methodology →